‘Clean chit’: NDTV glosses over SC panel’s inconclusive report on Adani-Hindenburg allegations

As the Supreme Court-appointed expert committee observed on Friday that there was “no coherent pattern of abusive trading” by the Adani group and that some of the charges were “still under investigation”, Adani-owned media house NDTV summed up the 173-page report in the catchphrase: “clean chit” for the group companies.

The expert panel report pertains to the investigations against Adani group for alleged violation of minimum public share-holding, disclosure of related party transactions and stock price manipulations. The allegations were stirred by a report titled, ‘Adani Group: How the world’s 3rd richest man is pulling the largest con in corporate history’, published by US-based short-seller Hindenburg Research on January 24. While the allegations were already being investigated by market regulator Sebi, the top court also formed an expert panel in March to probe the matter.   

In a barrage of reports and TV discussions on NDTV since the release of the expert panel report, the phrase “clean chit”, purportedly adopted from the investors’ lexicon, has appeared frequently.

Some of the headlines on NDTV read: Supreme Court panel's clean chit to Adani group: prima facie no violation; What experts said on Supreme Court panel's clean chit to Adani group; Opinion: After expert panel's clean chit to Adani group, big questions for Congress; Supreme Court-appointed panel's clean chit to Adani group; "Should calm ruffled feathers": Mukul Rohatgi on Supreme Court panel's clean chit to Adani group.

In a TV report on the matter, BQ Prime executive editor Niraj Shah also emphasised that “now the Supreme court committee has given a clean chit” and from the “equity watchers perspective… it is the biggest shot in the arm”.

This is not an exhaustive list. However, it is in stark contrast to the studied silence maintained by the news network early this year after Hindenburg Research published its report.

While the reports on the news network emphasise on “no evidence of any wrongdoing” by the company, which the anchors say could be “effectively seen as a clean chit for the Adani group”, most of them do not mention that the committee’s report is not conclusive and that the investigation is still underway. Most of the reports also do not carry the disclosure that the NDTV is owned by the Adani group.

The reports laud the group’s efforts to “comfort its investors” by paying of debt and infusing fresh investment in the group companies, however, they leave out crucial information on the on-going investigations in the matter, including the committee’s observation that the Sebi “suspects wrongdoing” on the ownership of foreign portfolio investors, however, it has not been able to point out the violations.

The expert committee has also said that it cannot express a view on the related party transactions in connection with 13 overseas entities, which have been on the Sebi radar since October 2020, as the market regulator is still investigating the transactions.

It further said that the committee would be “unable to comment without further input”, except to state that the “investigations must be completed in a time bound manner” as per law. 

Unlike NDTV’s sweeping conclusion, most other publications including the Economic Times, Business Today, Outlook India and Mint reported that the Supreme Court panel’s report states that it cannot conclude currently that the Sebi has failed on the Adani-Hindenburg allegations. 



source https://www.newslaundry.com/2023/05/20/clean-chit-ndtv-glosses-over-sc-panels-inconclusive-report-on-adani-hindenburg-allegations

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sushant Rajput case to Zubair arrest: The rise and rise of cop KPS Malhotra

“Time is not a factor. An old tweet becomes new just by a retweet. Police action is contingent upon when police takes cognisance of an issue,” KPS Malhotra, deputy commissioner of Delhi police, told the news agency ANI after the cyber crimes division he heads arrested Alt News cofounder Muhammad Zubair on Monday. Zubair’s arrest is under a cloud of suspicion, drawing condemnation from several press bodies, including the Editors Guild and the Press Club of India. The journalist was called for questioning in a 2020 case in which he has protection from arrest from the Delhi high court, only to be held for allegedly hurting religious sentiments and promoting enmity through a four-year-old tweet , which an anonymous tweeter who has since vanished from the social media platform apparently found offensive. Zubair’s is the latest high-profile case to be investigated by Malhotra, who was chosen to lead the cyber cell – officially Intelligence Fusion and Strategic Operations – last Septemb
Read more

Delhi University polls: Decoding first-time voters’ decisions

Image
On the polling day of Delhi University’s student body elections on Friday, thousands of students casted their votes at both the collegiate and central student union levels. Several of these students were first-time voters. Newslaundry spoke to Delhi University students to understand the factors that decided the students’ votes. For several students, the parties’ manifesto, promises and issues addressed by the candidates were the deciding factors, while some others pointed to the use of money and muscle power. Aman, a student of Ramjas College, said, “We saw rampant use of money, caste and muscle power in these elections. I come from Bihar…I have witnessed this from my childhood. But I used to think it happens in Bihar because many are not literate there… After coming to Delhi University, I saw the same use of caste and money even here.” Watch. Aspiring editor, hopeful politician, farmer’s son: Meet DUSU’s presidential candidates From fees to women’s safety: What are the key issu
Read more

Hafta letters: Caste census, Israel-Palestine conflict, Bajrang Dal

What does the job of a managing editor entail? Priyank *** Hi, your discussion on the Israel and Palestine issue was way better and informative than Charcha. In your discussion, Anand defined terrorist as per the UN and termed Hamas as a terrorist organisation. Then, according to the same definition, Bajrang Dal and the so-called cow vigilantes should also be called terrorist organisations. I want to know Anand’s views on it. Thanks.  Farqul Raizee *** Hi Team! In the previous Hafta, I found Anand’s argument for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine absurd. When you have a large neighbour who ‘expands for survival’, you will look for ways to preserve your sovereignty. An invasion because of this is unjustified. If China gets insecure due to India’s economic growth and invades India, can India be blamed? Perhaps this is why our Vishwaguru scuppered our economic growth with demonetisation - preemptively thwarting a Chinese invasion. Masterstroke, indeed! From the earlier Hafta, Mehraj’s
Read more